…supposedly enhance campus “diversity.” Professor Weisman’s case is not persuasive. Choosing to admit students (or to hire faculty or administrators) just because those individuals happen to have ancestry that puts…
…they reach their percentage of the population in every organization, irrespective of individual talent, achievement, merit, and suitability. This forced equality of result is dignified by terms such as “diversity”…
…their actions as good or bad, just or unjust, noble or ignoble. Related: Diversity Anger at UCLA The inward journey then follows a path to the interior of one’s soul….
“Academe is Overrun by Liberals. So What?” UCLA historian Russell Jacoby both declares and asks in a long Chronicle of Higher Education essay. Although published on April 1, it is…
…they are merely the instruments used to provide “diversity” to others, not its beneficiaries. There is a final irony fueling Stokes’ anger, an anger usually expressed in the language of…
David Leonhardt, an economics columnist for the New York Times, recently visited the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) and took a careful look at the current admissions process…