More Rumbles at UVa

The post-mortem
continues on the two weeks of turmoil that included the abrupt forced
resignation and the equally abrupt reinstatement of University of Virginia
president Teresa Sullivan. Everyone on all sides of the dispute over Sullivan’s
ousting seems to agree that the Board of Visitors, UVa’s trustees, behaved
secretively, discourteously, and ham-handedly when it handed Sullivan her
walking papers on June 10. Everyone seemed to be relieved when the board voted
unanimously on June 26 to invite her back, and that Sullivan and her chief
opponent on the board, UVa rector Helen Dragas, have pledged to work together
in unity (everyone, that is, except for some diehard radicals on the faculty
who were hoping to see Dragas and the rest of the board summarily canned).

But was the board
justified in pursuing some sort of urgent action over Sullivan’s
dilatory-seeming leadership, given UVa’s ever-escalating tuition and apparent
inability to control its budget? Or were the board members, Virginia
businesspeople with no experience in academia, so entranced by such Dilbert-esque
buzz-phrases as “strategic dynamism” (a phrase that appears that they
rumoredly wanted to get rid of the classics department at a university founded
by the classics-trained Thomas Jefferson? A department whose annual budget is
$1 million, a number that sounds large but represents only a tiny fraction of
the $2.6 billion that UVa spends annually? Did the board ignore–or
misunderstand–some of the genuine problems that UVa and many other prestigious
public universities face, such as the lack of a well-defined liberal-arts core
curriculum for undergraduates that might include an understanding of the
ancient Western world whose literature, art, and intellectual traditions form
the underpinnings of Western modernity?

The rumor about closing
down the classics department–which also included the proposed jettisoning of
UVa’s German department–formed the basis of a scathing conservative critique
of the Board of Visitors’ actions by James Ceaser, a political science
professor at UVa who writes frequently for conservative publications such as
the Weekly Standard. Speaking at a June 28 panel titled “What would
Jefferson Do?” sponsored by the Hudson Institute in Washington, Ceaser
asked, “Why would any conservative identify with the board’s
position?” He continued: “The whole conservative idea of an education
is based on a grounding in the liberal arts and the ability to exercise good
citizenship–civic education before global education. The Board of Visitors
looked indifferent to the liberal arts. Every conservative faculty I know was
opposed to the board’s decision. They took President Sullivan’s side. There
were questions that were never asked, such as: ‘What is a university supposed
to be?’ And ‘What is our University of Virginia supposed to be? What makes it
special?”

David Breneman, an
economics professor at UVa specializing in the economics of education and
public policy, took a similar stance: “The board seemed to be all about
‘strategic dynamism” versus going back to basics, like writing. Students
need a dedicated writing course, not ‘writing across the curriculum,'” he
said. (UVa requires its students to take freshman composition, but it is easy
to get out of the requirement, and most of the composition courses
themselves  have been turned by their
instructors into “theme” seminars centered around popular culture,
such as the ” “GaGa for Gaga: Sex, Gender, and Identity” class
that fulfilled the freshman writing requirement in the spring of 2011).
“Students need a course that teaches them the mechanics of writing,
measured by testing and assessing,” said Breneman. “I don’t agree
with Stanley Fish on much, but this is something that he’s been urging, too.”

The conservative
critiques from Ceaser and Breneman ensured that the third panel member, Michael
Poliakoff of the American Council of Trustees and Alumni, the sole supporter of
the board’s firing of Sullivan, would have a difficult task ahead of him as
devil’s advocate. Poliakoff, who holds a doctorate in classical studies from
the University of Michigan and was recently vice president for academic affairs
and research at the University of Colorado, bravely took head-on the UVa
board’s alleged assault on classics and German. He described them as
“imperiled programs.’ During the 2010-2011 academic year, for example, he
said, the department graduated only two German majors and awarded one
master’s degree and two doctoral degrees in German–all with a faculty of
fifteen people. The classics department fared a little better that academic
year, with eighteen bachelor’s degrees in classics, no master’s degrees, and
three doctorates, drawing on the talents of eleven faculty members. “German
programs are endangered everywhere in the country because their enrollment is
low,” said Poliakoff, pointing to a wave of recent closings or planned
closings of German departments, the most notorious being the University of
Southern California’s shutting down its German program in 2008. Poliakoff
suggested that the board might have been thinking about, as an alternative to
shutdowns, consolidating its German and classics programs departments with
those at other nearby universities. He cited as an example the joint German
program that Duke University operates in conjunction with the University of
North Carolina Chapel Hill.

Poliakoff speculated
that Sullivan’s problems with the UVa board lay less in what she had included
in a strategic plan that she submitted on May 12 than in what she had left out. “UVa’s budget increased 38 percent from 2004 to 2010,” he
pointed out, and Sullivan’s latest budget includes a 4.2 percent increase in
spending. “There was an opportunity for transformation that was missed,”
he said. “There’s the academic year, based on the agrarian calendar with
its long summer vacation, there are expansive laboratory facilities that are
underused, there are underused buildings, there’s the two-courses-per-semester
teaching load for professors that’s untenable.”

“Sometimes
impatience is a good thing,” Poliakoff said of the UVa board. “For
students faced with constant tuition increases the situation is urgent. We
don’t have a lot of time.”

Poliakoff obviously
couldn’t persuade Ceaser and Breneman, but all three agreed that a top priority
for U.Va., one to which its board perhaps paid insufficient attention, was to
do something about the loosey-goosey undergraduate curriculum at UVa that would
have shocked the rigorously educated Thomas Jefferson. “Some students
haven’t read a single serious text in all four years,” said Ceaser.

Charlotte Allen

Charlotte Allen blogs for the Los Angeles Times and writes frequently about cultural trends for the Weekly Standard.

2 thoughts on “More Rumbles at UVa

  1. I’m surprised the Board of Visitors reversed itself on Sullivan. UVA and UNC have the same problems. UNC has forsaken the mantle of “oldest state supported university”, “University of the people”. UNC is just another research institution dependent upon the Student Loan Administration to finance bloated faculty and administration. The president’s of these institutions are paid exorbitant salaries because that’s what the head hunter’s say they are worth.
    When Sullivan hired Michael Mann, she demonstrated a total lack of vision. Michael Mann is the problem with Universities: an overpaid academic prostitute who would declare the world flat for a successful grant, graduating academic zombies taught what to think rather than how to think with huge debt and limited skill sets.

  2. One problem for universities today is accrediting boards. They make mostly “progressive” demands concerning, for example, “diversity” that are very costly to universities. Indeed, I’d love to know what the “diversity” apparatus at UVa costs every year. How much do they spend implementing diversity, gender studies, Baloney studies, and bogus scientific research?
    Why is UVa starting up a new Center for Mediation Sciences in a time of rising tuitions? How much will that cost?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.