Student Fees, Snooki, and a Drag Queen Superstar

Thumbnail image for snooki.jpg

Like a creeping mildew on a shower wall, student fees easily go unnoticed. Yet they grow relentlessly until, one day, you look down in total disgust and there they are.

What are student fees next to the mountains of cash poured into tuition, room and board? A few hundred wasted dollars every year among tens of thousands. But just like mildew, even a little student fee waste is entirely too much once you realize what you’re buying.

Here are a few examples:

At Cornell, $7000 in student fees helped pay for a recent incarnation of an annual campus party called “Filthy/Gorgeous,” an event designed to “celebrate the LGBTQ community.” A campus news report details the notable features: “A bin of condoms sat on the table for people to take as they paid the $3 entry fee. Half-naked male and female dancers, some who work at the Splash Bar in New York City, were hired to get the crowd excited by sporadically kissing one another on stage and also by kissing members of the audience — regardless of gender. “

An annual outdoor rock and hip-hop festival at Cornell called “Slope Day,” is funded by more than $200,000 worth of student fees.

At Washington University in St. Louis, $10,350 in student fees went to pay for “A Night With the Stars: Life, Love, and Sex in the Workplace.” The “stars,” of course, were porn stars. And the goal of the event (which was ironically hosted in the campus chapel) was to educate students about careers in the sex industry. Apparently, when one porn star asked who in the crowd was interested in a career in porn, three students stood up. Proves good jobs are hard to find these days. One wonders if the school’s undergraduate career services office picked up part of the tab for the event.

At the University of Wisconsin, $100,000 went to fund an event called “Sex Out Loud.” Organizers used this money to purchase a variety of creative items to fill so-called “pleasure boxes.” These items included a “multifunction vibrator,” an “egg vibrator with a blossom sleeve,” “nipple cups,” “anal beads,” “floggers” (2 of them!), and, naturally, a 12-inch wooden paddle with “eight round openings.” The University of Wisconsin’s pleasure boxes were also stocked with brochures from Planned Parenthood–presumably just in case a child was conceived amidst all the flogging and paddling.

At Duke, they recently raised student fees in order to cover sex change surgeries for any student who wants one. What, after all, could be more critical to the education of America’s youth than the severing and surgical reconstruction of students’ genitals?

At the University of San Diego, a Catholic institution, student fees helped pay for an event called “Supreme Drag Superstar 2.” The performance starred Manila Luzon, described on his personal website as an “Asian Glamasaurus” drag queen. “Jesus is really mad I’m performing at University of San Diego,” wrote Luzon on his Facebook page. What the Glamasaurus didn’t mention were the angry protests from USD students who didn’t feel like they should be forced to pay for his show. More than 4,000 people around the country eventually signed a petition protesting the event.

And who could forget that time Rutgers University paid $32,000 to sponsor a lecture by Snooki from the MTV series “Jersey Shore”? Snooki, famous for her many drunken exploits on television, advised students to “Study hard, but party harder.” Bam, there’s your thirty-two grand. By the way, that’s more than they paid the Nobel Laureate Toni Morrison to speak that year.

Under the direct control of left-leaning student governments, student fees are directed year after year toward the bawdy and the gaudy. There’s no end to the intellectually useless parties, performance, liberal causes deemed worthy of student fee funding. But when a group of conservatives or Christians asks for a bit of money, it’s amazing how quickly the purse strings close.

At the University of Wisconsin, where they spent one hundred grand to pay for the necessary buzzing and spinning and welt-producing gadgets with which to stock all those “pleasure boxes,” the university administration told a student group called Badger Catholic it “could not use the fees to fund any activity that included prayer, worship, or religious activity.” It took a lawsuit to make U of Wisconsin administrators change their minds, deciding at last that a little prayer could hurt no more than a “12-inch wooden paddle with eight rounding openings.”

And at Cornell, where “Filthy/Gorgeous” merits seven grand a year in official funding, a Christian group was denied funding because the fraternity would not agree to accept an openly gay student as a leader of the group.

In a similar, high-profile case at Vanderbilt University, school officials deprived several mostly conservative Christian student groups of meeting space and funding because those groups require their leaders to actually share the beliefs of the organizations they seek to lead. Vandy officials could not tolerate those groups’ intolerance.

There are two problems with the way student fees are typically used in the U.S. First, they are used, disproportionately, to the advantage of liberal groups. For example, take a look at the laundry list of liberal pet projects receiving student activity fees at CU Boulder. You’ve got your “Environmental Center,” your “Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual, Transgender Resource Center,” your “Center for Equity.” Looks like in Boulder every center leans left.

The other problem is the waste. It seems strange that  colleges are spending so much on extracurricular activities even as student debt reaches record heights and as many campuses face  budget shortfalls. Wouldn’t it be better to fund a few scholarships for needy kids instead? All that waste won’t sit well with all the parents who are taking out second mortgages to pay for their kids’ educations.

Lately, more and more students have started complaining, constituting a kind of national student fee backlash. At the University of New Mexico, they’ve doubled student fees in the last two years, prompting angry students to demand a meeting with the university president. At the University of Utah, they tacked on an additional $150 in student fees for new freshman, prompting protests. At UC Berkeley, dozens of students marched on the university health center in February, protesting a hike in student health fees. In March, Students for a Democratic Society at the University of Minnesota gathered with union members to march against high student fees and other ills.

Ironically, liberal student groups are behind most of the organized protests against student fee hikes, while at the same time, liberal student groups are the kinds of groups that are most likely to receive student fee dollars. From the looks of things, those students haven’t picked up on the irony yet. 


One thought on “Student Fees, Snooki, and a Drag Queen Superstar”

  1. I was on the student government for the graduate school of a Major University. All we did was pass out the student fee money. (I thought we’d actually do some governing, or I would not have run for it.) This was in the mid-90’s, so it was a left leaning body (as I was at the time, but not nearly as left as they were.) But this was before the sex and porn garbage started rearing its ugly head on campuses. But we got requests for money for a student group to go to Cuba, which I was less than thrilled about. Jewish student groups were always treated to extra scrutiny, and given less than was requested because, “They can always get much more from the community. The Jewish community has a lot of money to give them.” I TRIED to discuss making a formula for how to give out money: Consider how many grad students were part of the organization and how many grad students were probably going to be served by the function for which the money was requested, directly or indirectly, and what was the educational value of that for which the money was requested. (Specifically, how did it relate to specific grad progams on campus.) The application already asked these questions; I was just trying to get the body to use the answers to determine how much money was given to them.
    BTW, Jewish student groups always got less than was requested, Christian groups got less, but not quite as less as the Jewish groups, non-Jewish grad student groups almost always got the amount they requested, left-leaning grad student groups always got MORE than they requested. The sums were usually a few hundred dollars, rarely $1000 or more. But as long as grad students were somehow involved, the requesting group almost always got SOME amount of money.
    However, I thought it was all a crock. I recall someone on the student goverment having a cow over the idea that HER “money” was going to fund a Jewish group’s event. My response that HER money wasn’t; mine was, and that her money went to the Muslim student association’s eid banquet while my money didn’t. She did shut up after that.
    Stop with the student fees that get handed out this way–leave them to the students and they can give their money to whatever group or event they want. And the student groups can do their own fundraising. Student fees can be used for SOME aspects of programming, I suppose. But minimally.
    I was in grad school working on a PhD because I wanted to teach at the college level. I left in disgust. Really feel I dodged a bullet there!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *