By Edward Morrissey

The University of Michigan swerved away from folly yesterday byamerican-sniper reversing a decision not to show the popular film American Sniper on campus after 300 students protested its depiction of the late Chris Kyle. In a statement written by a group called Middle Eastern and North African (MENA) and the Muslim Students Association, protesters had accused the film of promoting bigotry – and of provoking emotional triggers in students.

“Anti-Muslim and anti-MENA hate crimes are growing increasingly common,” the protest statement read. “These incidents create an unsafe space that does not allow for positive dialogue and triggers U of M students.” Even the screening of such a film presents a danger for students, the group insists. “[W]atching this movie is provocative and unsafe to MENA and Muslim students who are too often reminded of how little the media and world values their lives. What we instead should offer is compassion and respect towards others.”

The re-scheduling of the film as a Friday night campus movie came in an announcement from E. Royster Harper, the university’s vice president for student life: It was a mistake to cancel the showing of the movie “American Sniper” on campus as part of a social event for students. The initial decision to cancel the movie was not consistent with the high value the University of Michigan places on freedom of expression and our respect for the right of students to make their own choices in such matters. The movie will be shown at the originally scheduled time and location. 

Of course, this film has played all over the world without seeing communities descend into hate crimes, threats, or even overly triggered college students huddled in corners. There’s a reason for that, which is that the film version of American Sniper doesn’t resemble the picture painted by this protest.

The memoir, penned by Kyle himself before his murder in Texas, does argue that those specific Iraqis fighting against the US forces in the war were “savages,” and Kyle makes his distaste of them clear. In the film, though, Clint Eastwood uses the fighting and Kyle’s experiences to construct a much different narrative. The film explores the dehumanizing aspects of war from a sniper’s point of view (which Kyle also discussed in his memoirs), and presents those experience with much more ambivalence than enthusiasm.

The climax of the film does not come with a glorious kill shot, but with Kyle’s recovery from the brutal experiences – and odd addiction – to war by serving fellow veterans wounded physically, emotionally, and spiritually by the same brutality.

Normally, this is exactly the kind of nuance that one would expect to see welcomed on a university campus, which, at the very least, is supposed to explore the fog of war—or at least acknowledge it.  Students should have had a chance to view the film before condemning it. Not at the University of Michigan, apparently.

Even without screening the film, the Center for Campus Involvement (CCI) – a part of Michigan’s administration – had issued an apology for “causing harm to members of our community,” and for “ma[king] students feel unsafe and unwelcome at our program.” In the future, CCI would “screen for content that can negatively stereotype a group.”

Rick Fitzgerald, the school’s spokesperson, in announcing the original cancellation, wrote that each of CCI’s  eight UMix Friday night events  is  intended to “be a fun event and one welcoming to all students,” and that CCI would choose a different movie for that purpose. Instead of airing American Sniper at its event on Friday as originally scheduled, CCI instead would screen it on another date, “with an appropriate educational panel discussion.”

Left unstated is why a panel discussion of a box-office smash is required just to air it at all, but that’s the least of the issues here. It’s worth noting that UMix events are not mandatory, nor are film screenings during them. The 300 or so students at Michigan who objected to it could have chosen to do something else on Friday night, or just aired their grievances without demanding that the film get pulled.

Its website describes the school as “a diverse and vibrant community,” boasting of a student body of over 43,000 young men and women, with a faculty of more than 3,000 tenured and tenure-tracked instructors. The university allowed less than 1 percent of its “diverse and vibrant community” dictate the terms of speech on their campus.

Why do young men and women go to college in the first place? Especially in the last decade, the costs have skyrocketed, often placing young adults into crippling debt for their education. A college degree gives people a jump start on their earning potential, but the reason it supposedly does so is because education brings them into contact with new ideas, challenges their assumptions, and opens them to wisdom.

The University of Michigan chose to do exactly the opposite. They certainly didn’t have to screen American Sniper, but their retreat on that choice deprived thousands of Wolverines of the opportunity to see and hear another point of view. Instead, they succumbed to the notion that free speech matters less than “triggers” and emotional responses, even those ignorant of the true nature of the speech about to take place. Unfortunately, Michigan’s actions are the rule rather than the exception on college campuses, where speech codes impose limits on free expression and debate, and administrators worry more about the fragile psyches of their students than exposing them to heterodox thinking.

However, at least the students attending the UMix on Friday will still have a movie to see, one more suited to the way that the school sees their charges. Fitzgerald confirmed that CCI would screen a more suitable film in place of American Sniper …Paddington, based on the beloved children’s book series. How utterly appropriate, and how demonstrative of Michigan’s paternalism and condescension displayed in this decision. Perhaps next time, the university’s administrators can watch American Sniper for its lessons in courage, if nothing else.

Political analyst Edward Morrissey has been writing and blogging since 2003. He is also a senior editor at Hot Air, part of the Townhall/Hot Air group of conservative publications, and hosts a weekly radio show in Minnesota.

This article was published originally in The Fiscal Times.
Read more at The Fiscal Times:


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *