Never Mind Science—Be Authentic

“Animal Cognition” becomes “Human Ideology”

“Allies … will have ‘ALLY’ presented on their name badges at the conference.”

What kind of conference is this, one wonders? Athletic? Religious? Political?

None of the above. This is the 2023 conference of the Comparative Cognition Society (CCS), a small scientific organization devoted to understanding the intelligence and learning capacities of animals. The “Ally” information is from a new group created by the organization’s president.

Does “ally” refer to ethical matters involving the well-being of animals—a PETA initiative, perhaps? Or maybe it represents an effort by CCS to resist attacks on animal research?

None of the above. The committee gently explains:

Warm greetings from your new Equity, Diversity and Inclusion (EDI) committee. We are here to help promote EDI initiatives in the society, and are excited to share some of the new features you might notice at the CO3 [comparative cognition] conference this year … The CCS EDI Committee has advanced the following five initiatives with the goal of creating a welcoming and inclusive environment for all …

The committee’s first job is to conduct a “Demographic Survey.” Will this involve counting animal species under study? Well, no, of course not. The survey will group people by career position, age (in 5-year increments, up to 84), country of residence, race (10 categories), gender (6 categories), how well they can speak English (!), and marginalized-group membership (11 categories).

Other questions include, “Do you feel that, in the context of CCS and the CO3 conference, you can be yourself openly and authentically?” and “In what ways do you think that CCS and the CO3 conference could improve to become more equitable, diverse, and inclusive going forward? [as opposed to “going backward,” which is not yet feasible].”

Next, readers are referred to a thousand-word Code of Conduct, much of which states etiquette that should not have to be reiterated. But it also rates as “unacceptable” “Verbal comments related to gender, sexual orientation, disability, physical appearance, age, body size, race, religion, national origin. [italics added]” Any verbal comments? Would the claim that “Marie Curie was female” lead to disciplinary action? Possibly. But saying that Roscoe Arbuckle was “fat” is surely over the line.

This is followed by an invitation to snitch:

If you are the subject of unacceptable behavior, have witnessed any such behavior, or are acting as an ally to someone who was the subject of unacceptable behavior, please notify a CCS EDI member on-site or e-mail your concern to [emphasis mine].

Then there is a section on that essential feature—pronouns—beginning, helpfully, with the question, “What are personal pronouns?” and continuing with a link to a 21-page American Psychological Association document titled “Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Inclusive Language Guidelines.”

[Related: “How to Harpoon the DEI Leviathan”]

Finally, we have allyship:

Allies are people who recognize the unearned privilege they receive from society’s patterns of injustice and take responsibility for changing these patterns. Being an ally is more than being sympathetic and feeling bad for those who experience discrimination. An ally is willing to act with, and for, others in pursuit of ending oppression and creating equality.

Join the team, scientist: acknowledge your privilege, feel virtuous, grovel a little! But to be really safe, you must do something to “end oppression”—be an ally!

Do you feel better and more authentic now? Or, possibly, just a little nervous?

* * *

So, a scientific organization devoted to an uncontroversial topic, animal cognition, with zero evidence of past racial or gender discrimination, is subjected to the benign, benevolent (oh so benevolent!) and self-righteous rule of a philosophy derived not from science, but from a mixture of cultural Marxism, DiAngelo-esque white fragility, and the faux-psychology of authenticity. Cultural Marxists will agree that we are all (except for “marginalized groups”) bearers of “privilege.” Inequality is always unjust and must be abolished. “White fragility” softens up whites with the message that they are ineradicably racist, and that if they deny it, it just proves their racism. And, of course, authenticity is always good, which implies that no one is authentically bad—which is false. There are authentically bad people, even among ‘allies.’

After succumbing to “allyship,” and, perhaps, being warned a couple of times about their potential microaggressions, most of the now-cowed cognitive scientists will have forgotten that the purpose of the CO3 meeting is science; that the virtues to be promoted should be honesty, rigor, and creativity; and that the demographic makeup of the group is utterly irrelevant.

Good job, EDI’ers! You’ve shown how effective a short slogan like ally can be! (Another one that worked pretty well is heil).

Image: Adobe Stock


7 thoughts on “Never Mind Science—Be Authentic

  1. Seems to me like you set out to make people feel different in your sorting, absolutely outrageous imo.
    I’m sure your intentions are meant to be good acknowledging your “privilege” but you have to be narcissistic to think this helps anyone, it’s obscene and can only do more harm than good imo.
    Reflect, Dr Peterson is correct!

  2. If a bridge or road needs fixing, does it matter what the engineers’ race or gender etc is? Or just that he is the most competent at it?!

  3. Dr. Peterson, this “ally” group thinking, and this “we’re all victim mindset” where does it stem from. You mentioned narcissists, but from what I understand so far, the “I am a victim” thinking does not stem from narcissists. Maybe it is a weapon they use to subjugate their victims and bring them under their “safe ally shelter”, so that they can use them as pawns. Do you think this “you’re a victim” stems from narcissistic tendencies?

    1. It is narcissism in a climate where being a victim is inherently a virtue. Everything is all about the “victim”; i.e. narcissist. It is very self-centered and self-righteous. The exact sort of *pride*ful self-righteousness that Christ warned about.

  4. I have been conducting research in multiple STEM fields for a long time. Over the years I have attended dozens of scientific conferences, all of them international conferences (as opposed to regional), usually held outside of the United States. I must admit, I’ve never been to a conference where ideas presented were accepted, rejected or even criticized based on the speaker’s race or sex. No white privilege there, apparently. I’ve never been to a international conference where someone said they didn’t feel “welcome” or “included” because they were black or asian or whatever. I’ve never been to an international conference where everybody sorted themselves—even at the receptions—according to race or sex. I’ve never been to an international conference where presenters said they felt “oppressed” or “unsafe” because of their skin color. Indeed, I’ve never encountered a mathematician, engineer, or computer scientist at any of these international conferences who claimed they were even slightly discriminated against because of whatever immutable characteristic chosen by the DEI mobs. Everybody was their for one and only one purpose: to exchange ideas and forge new research collaborations.

    I guess we were all lucky. None of us at those international conferences realized we so urgently needed an ally…

    1. Yep. Same here. Case in point:
      Battelle holds an international symposium every 4 years on the complex topic of assessment and remediation of chlorinated compounds. If one looks at the dozens of presenters, panelists, speakers, etc. in this link from the 2018, one gets a good perspective of the diversity of the presenters from all over the world. Having presented at one of these, we feel confident that if you asks the non-white presenters from all over the world if they felt any unease at any time during the event related to race, ethnicity, etc., they would laugh in your face and feel insulted.

      If this bothers you, stop by and see us >

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *