HOME FORUM OUR ESSAYS MUST READS LINKS ABOUT US CAU  
 

Academic Studies
Book Reviews
College Athletics
Core Studies
Costs and Tuition
Curriculum
Diversity
Free Speech
Gender Studies
Military Issues
Miscellaneous
Politics
Professors and Tenure
Professional Schools
Quotas and Preferences
Trustees and Alumni

Accuracy in Academia
Arts and Letters Daily
American Scholar
Campus Magazine
Chronicle of Higher Ed
City Journal
Claremont Review of   Books
Commentary
Education Next
First Things
Hoover Digest
Hudson Review
Inside Higher Ed
New Atlantis
New Criterion
New Republic
NY Times—Education
New Yorker
Policy Review
Salon
School and College
Slate
Times Higher
   Education

WSJ Opinion
Washington Post - Education
Washington Monthly
Weekly Standard

ACTA Online
Althouse
Arma Virumque
Becker-Posner Blog
Brainstorm
Center for College   Affordability and   Productivity
The Choice
Cliopatria
College Freedom
Critical Mass
Dan Drezner
Dankprofessor
Discriminations
Durham-In-Wonderland
Education Next
The Faculty Lounge
FIRE The Torch
Frontpagemagazine
Higher Ed Watch
Instapundit
Joanne Jacobs
NAS
TNR Open University
NR Phi Beta Cons
NoIndoctrination
Patrick Deneen
PointofLaw
ProfessorBainbridge
Tax Law Prof
David Thompson
University Diaries
Volokh Conspiracy
Keith Windschuttle

 


FEATURED ARTICLE


The Ominous Rise Of The Adjuncts
By Maurice Black & Erin O'Connor Review of John C. Cross and Edie Goldenberg's Off-Track Profs: Nontenured Teachers in Higher Education. (Cambridge: MIT Press): 2009.
According to the AAUP, 48 percent of faculty are part-timers, and 68 percent of all faculty appointments take place off the tenure track. The American Federation of Teachers (AFT) cites comparable numbers, reporting that a mere 27 percent of postsecondary instructors hold fulltime, tenure-track positions. Such figures are the familiar touchstones of debates about the nature and future of academic work, undergraduate education, and academic freedom...
Continue reading...

LATEST COMMENTARY


· Temple Betrays Its Heritage, Stephen Zelnick, NAS, July 2
· All The Wrong Incentives, George Leef, Pope Center, July 1
· Court Declines Truth V. Kent, William Creeley, FIRE, July 1
· One Way To Help The World,
· The Education Mill, Richard Vedder, Claremont Review Of Books, June 30
· Persistent Myths In Feminist Scholarship, Christina Hoff Somers, Chronicle Of Higher Education, June 30
· What Does Ricci Mean For Higher Ed?, Peter Wood, NAS, June 30
· Is College Worth It?, John Lounsbury, Seeking Alpha, June 29
· Bucknell University Lies Again, Adam Kissel, FIRE, June 26
· What's Critical About "Critical Globalization Studies?", Peter Wood, NAS, June 25

More >>>

OUR RECENT ESSAYS

· Standpoint Theory Arrives At The Court, Daphne Patai, Minding The Campus, June 23
· The Cambridge Empire Strikes Back, Harvey Silverglate, Minding The Campus, June 16
· The Illinois Admissions Scandal, Richard Kahlenberg, Minding The Campus, June 11
· The Murder At Harvard, John McWhorter, Minding The Campus, June 4

All Essays >>>

FORUM

June 30, 2009

Your Orientation Stories Wanted

We're looking for any upcoming or recent accounts of freshman orientation from those who've undergone the process or shortly will. PC skits, "white privilege" games, and the like, we're interested in all of this. Any stories are welcome and encouraged. Write us or urge anyone you know who might be going through the process to write us at editor@campusmind.org


June 29, 2009

Are Ed Schools Failing?

The National Council for the Accreditation of Teacher Education (NCATE) seems finally to have perceived what was in plain view to many people: that most of America's ed schools are mediocre at best, offering curricula that mix lightweight courses, ivory-tower ideology, and minimal clinical exposure of student teachers to real-life classrooms.

NCATE has revised upwards the standards that the 632 college and graduate-level education programs it accredits---a little more than half of the nation's 1,200-odd teacher-training courses of study-- must meet in order to maintain their accreditations. Currently only a few of those schools meet NCATE's highest levels of achievement, and many rate as merely "acceptable"---the lowest level an ed school can meet and still qualify for accreditation. Now, NCATE says, institutions must not be acceptable but "demonstrate continuous improvement toward excellence."

Ed school critics have complained for years that the curricula at many education programs skimp on content knowledge (many history teachers don't know much about history, and many math teachers can barely add or subtract, let alone help youngsters learn those operations). The programs also waste credit hours and ed students' time on trendy theories (Marxism, feminism, and the "pedagogy of the oppressed," just to name a few) and teaching techniques that are light on proven usefulness but heavy on academic fashionableness, whether it's having high-schoolers make a poster in English class instead of writing an essay, so as to cater to "multiple intelligences," or having middle-schoolers who misbehave participate in a "talking circle" instead of having to leave the classroom, all in the name of "restorative justice," one of the latest trends in school discipline.

Continue reading "Are Ed Schools Failing?" »

Once Bronte, Now Dan Brown: Summer Reading

High schools appear to be steadily dumbing down summer reading assignments, if this Boston Globe report is any indication. One teacher:

..created a cheeky list with titles like Pride and Prejudice and Zombies by Seth Grahame-Smith and Our Dumb World by The Onion. The former is a spoof on the Jane Austen classic that has the Bennet daughters more concerned with self-defense than marriage, and the latter pokes fun at Americans and, well, everything.

Unfortunate, but not really any surprise, if you've paid any attention to college summer reading assignments lately.


June 25, 2009

College Isn't Any Cheaper Yet

"Maximize Your 529 College Savings Plan" from the Boston Globe

June 22, 2009

Erasing Israel At York University

Those who suspect that "Middle Eastern studies" is actually a code word for anti-Israel advocacy have some new evidence to support their position: an entire academic conference scheduled for this week at York University in Toronto that appears to be entirely devoted to the idea of erasing the state of Israel from the map. The conference, scheduled to run from June 22 through June 24, is titled "Israel/Palestine: Mapping Models of Statehood and Prospects for Peace."

Yet the overwhelming majority of the 44 speakers scheduled to read papers, many of whom are not professional scholars (and of those who are, many are not experts in the Middle East but rather in law, film, medicine, and other fields) have only one "model of statehood" in mind for the lands between the Jordan River and the Mediterranean: a single, putatively secular political entity that would encompass all of Israel, the West Bank, Gaza, and the Golan Heights and in which Jews would be vastly outnumbered by Muslim Arabs and the Jewish identity of the land in which they live would be annihilated. The conference is jointly sponsored by York, Queens University in Kingston, Ontario, and a Canadian government entity, the Social Sciences and Humanities Council, which helped fund the conference with a grant of nearly $20,000.

To get an idea of the one-sided ideological thrust of the conference, you need only click to its website, which prominently features two maps, on neither of which the state of Israel (or any other political entity west of the Jordan) is demarcated or otherwise identified. One of the maps features a zipper, presumably a symbol of a successful effort to stitch up the boundaries of the various contested lands, but it functions visually in a different way: to portray Israel as visually swallowed up.

Continue reading "Erasing Israel At York University" »

June 18, 2009

Become A Fan!

Become a fan of the Manhattan Institute on Facebook - enjoy easy updates to MI material and entertain and inform yourself all-around.

Join here.

June 15, 2009

Does Tenure Mean You Can't Be Laid Off?

Two weeks ago a state district judge in Denver issued a ruling that makes it next to impossible for a college in the Colorado state system to revise its faculty handbook so as to make it easier to lay off tenured faculty members in the event of a reduction in employment force, even when state law and the previous version of the faculty handbook itself allow the college to make the revisions.

Denver District Judge Norman D. Haglund's June 8 order, in the case of Saxe vs. Board of Trustees of Metropolitan State College of Denver, which has spent at least five years in the Colorado court system, including an appeal, stated that the "public interest" in the academic freedom of tenured faculty outweighs any public interest that a financially stretched public college might have in preserving flexibility in hiring and firing tenured professors so as to serve its student body more effectively. As Inside Higher Education reported, Haglund effectively said that "not only is tenure a good thing for the professors who enjoy it, it is valuable to the public."

As Inside Higher Ed also reported, the Saxe case is "much more important" than the specific issues at play, which involved the efforts of the trustees of Metro State, a 21,500-student, heavily Hispanic four-year public college in one of Denver's oldest urban neighborhoods, to put into effect a revised faculty handbook in 2003 that rescinded a provision in the previous handbook, issued in 1994, generally requiring that non-tenured faculty be laid off before the jobs of tenured faculty members be touched. The 1994 handbook also required that that college first attempt to place affected tenured professors in other campus jobs, a requirement that the trustees rescinded in 2003. Haglund ruled that the changes amounted to a deprivation of the "vested rights" of tenured Metro State professors.

Continue reading "Does Tenure Mean You Can't Be Laid Off?" »

More >>>

 

The Manhattan Insitute's Center for the American University.

 Minding the Campus is dedicated to the revival of intellectual pluralism and the best traditions of liberal education at America's universities. Look here for the most current thoughts and opinions on American academic reform.

The financial crisis is having serious effects on college and university endowments and operating budgets. Minding the Campus will provide ongoing coverage of the ways in which institutions of higher education are coping—and what priorities they are choosing.
· Should The Unemployed Go Back To School?, May 19, 2009
· Does Tenure Mean You Can't Be Laid Off?, June 15, 2009

More articles >>
 


"Threats To Academic Freedom: Do Campuses And Courts Care?"
Speaker: Donald Downs
May 5, 2009

"The Dumbest Generation: How the Digital Age Stupefies Young Americans and Jeopardizes Our Future"
Speaker: Mark Bauerlein
January 8, 2009

"Tenured Radicals"
Speaker: Roger Kimball
November 19, 2008

"Education's End"
Speaker: Anthony Kronman
May 29, 2008

"Unclassical Education"
Speaker: Victor Davis Hanson
April 24, 2008

 


editor@campusmind.com

MEDIA INQUIRIES:
Bridget Sweeney
Press Officer
Manhattan Institute
212-599-7000



 
Sign up for MTC email alerts
Email Address:

Name:

Affiliation:

Published by the Manhattan Institute
The Manhattan Insitute's Center for the American University.